Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Perez Sanz vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sanz vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
David Perez Sanz vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sanz 4 - 1 Nijboer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sanz has won 49.1% of points on their second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sanz, in recent form, has won 51.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 52.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.85% and 36.24% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sanz has saved 52.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 53.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sanz has won 55% of matches played (W/L 22/ 18), with Nijboer winning 62.11% (W/L 59/ 36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sanz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 289/ 136), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Sanz has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55% of matches (W/L 22/ 18), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.7% of matches (W/L 46/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Sanz winning 4 times and Nijboer being victorious 0 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with Sanz winning 8 and Nijboer winning 3. The last match between Sanz and Nijboer was at the M25 Mungia-Laukariz, 18-06-2024, First, Clay with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:48.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sanz and Nijboer have played a deciding set 2 times, with Sanz winning 2 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sanz winning 2, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sanz has played against opponents with an average rank of 132.15 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 195.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sanz has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sanz has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 43.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
832
Rank
216
High
30
Age
Plays
4
Total1
4
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
431
Rank
424
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
62% (451-275)
Career Total W/L
57% (228-173)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
58% (26-19)
$0
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For David Perez Sanz vs Ryan Nijboer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sanz VS Nijboer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 3 |
| Games Won | 60 | 46 |
| Aces (Total) | 19 | 10 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:48 | 1:31:48 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (182/297) | 62% (213/343) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (138/182) | 65% (138/213) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (60/115) | 48% (62/130) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 39% (14/36) | 37% (7/19) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (143/343) | 33% (99/297) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 ret. | |||||
| 7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 |
Stats 
David Perez Sanz
Player
Ryan Nijboer
64%
(
67 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
68 of
93)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
45 of
68)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 2-6 7-6(0) |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Ryan Nijboer
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
56%
(
62 of
110)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
43 of
110)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Perez Sanz | Ryan Nijboer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 58% (26/19) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (26/21) | 56% (59/46) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (229/213) | 53% (521/471) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (7/7) | 73% (8/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 58% (18/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 56 | 140 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.38 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 182 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:19 | 1:52:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 136.14 | 232.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (701/1145) | 60% (1872/3116) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (464/701) | 68% (1273/1872) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (218/444) | 48% (598/1244) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (62/157) | 44% (160/366) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (521/1233) | 42% (1331/3165) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (9/11) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (12/10) | 68% (17/8) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 57% (25/44) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 50% (7/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 50% (8/16) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 81% (26/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 19% (26/5) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 26% (19/5) |
David Perez Sanz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jules Marie
Player
David Perez Sanz
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
0
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
9
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martins Rocens
Player
David Perez Sanz
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
David Perez Sanz
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
33 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Milan Markovits
50%
(
23 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Mario Mansilla Diez
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
9 of
14)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Perez Sanz
Player
Ignasi Forcano
40%
(
22 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-1 14-12 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Ryan Nijboer
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
49%
(
32 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Frederico Ferreira Silva
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
71%
(
70 of
99)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
0
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
47 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
107
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Iliyan Radulov
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Sergio Callejon Hernando
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Ryan Nijboer
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
47 of
70)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
25 of
70)
72
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Ryan Nijboer
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
67%
(
69 of
103)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
1-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sanz Vs Nijboer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sanz are available here and Nijboer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
